keratin.com, hair loss, baldness, alopecia, disease, and treatment information

STERIODS CREAM

keratin.com > keratin.com Forum Index > Alopecia Areata > STERIODS CREAM
Hair Biology
Diagnosis / Decisions
Androgenetic Alopecia Biology
Androgenetic Alopecia Clinical Patterns
Androgenetic Alopecia Treatments
Hair Restoration
Alopecia Areata
Effluviums
Scarring Alopecias
Inflammatory Alopecias
Other Alopecias
Hair Shaft Defects
Infectious Hair Disease
Hirsutism / Hypertrichosis
Hair Color
Hair Cosmetics
Bits and Pieces
Immunology
Discussion Forums
Personal / Site Information
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
Reply to topic
The time now is Tue Feb 09, 2010 2:29 am. All times are GMT
Previous Thread | Next Thread >
STERIODS CREAM
Author: admin  Site Admin
Post Sun Jun 08, 2003 7:45 am 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  Reply with quote  

Well, the clinical trials on humans has begun so we will find out won't we?
_________________
Kevin - The management - keratin.com

Author: fonzie  Senior Poster
Post Sun Jun 08, 2003 2:35 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  

True... They should have the results by the summer, let's see what happens.

I'm curious, how much money does a firm have to spend in order to approve a new product like this one? How much do you think they have to spend in order to reach a stage where they know for sure if it works or not?

I understand big pharmas can run the risk of having unsuccessful attempts, but can a small biotech run that risk too?


Last edited by fonzie on Sun Jun 08, 2003 4:20 pm; edited 1 time in total

Author: fonzie  Senior Poster
Post Sun Jun 08, 2003 4:19 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  

Kevin, if all the available topical immunosupressants and immunomodulators reached the hair follicle, which one do you think would be the most effective in treating AA?

Author: kristin  Guest
Post Mon Jun 09, 2003 4:23 pm 
   Reply with quote  

topicals

Our experience with topical steroids has been the same as with oral steroids therefore it makes no sense to me to use a topical steroid that penetrates well because the results will be temporary. Clobetasol in Zinc Cap worked wonders for my daughter, she acheived full regrowth, quickly. BUT should you miss a day, or should you not be able to get quite as much through to the scalp, the hair will fall out, just as if you stopped taking an oral steroid. In our case the hair fell out at an alarming rate and no amout of topical would stop it. Maybe the body just gets used to it and so it no longer works after a while. Either way, this wouldn't seem like a good long term treatment to me, perhaps for people that only get a spot here and there it would be great. Otherwise it's just cruel. If they could make a topical penetrate better then I would hope that it wouldn't have the same systemic effects as steroids do.

Author: fonzie  Senior Poster
Post Mon Jun 09, 2003 6:15 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  

Hi Kristin,

What you say is quite true, but steroids in topical liposomes could potentially substitute steroid shots... and that would be great for many patchy AA sufferers - no pain, lower cost, fewer systemic absorption (I hope).

Anyway, I was also thinking of other immunomodulators that could perhaps be used in the long term without significant side-effects like cyclosporin, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, rapamycin or maybe even calcipotriol.

The systemic impact of topical liposomes I think is still pretty much unknown, but it shouldn't be very harsh. The vectron clinical trials will probably give us a clue to that.

Author: fonzie  Senior Poster
Post Thu Jun 12, 2003 11:20 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  

Kevin, I had an appointment with a dermatologist today, and we were discussing this issue of skin penetration in AA.

She didn't seem to understand much about liposomes, but she suggested I'd go to a * and buy some kind of steroid pills (deflazacort I think) and get the * to break it into powder. Then I'd bring the powder to her office and she would use it to perform something called hydro iontophoresis (transdermal). Do you know what that is??

Author: fonzie  Senior Poster
Post Thu Jun 12, 2003 11:32 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  

Found this:

http://www.empi.ca/b/b4.htm


quote:
What is Iontophoresis?
Iontophoresis is an alternative drug delivery system. By applying a low-level electrical current to a similarly charged drug solution, iontophoresis repels the drug ions through the skin to the underlying tissue. In contrast to passive transdermal patch drug delivery, iontophoresis is an active (electrically driven) method that allows the delivery of water-soluble ionic drugs that are not effectively absorbed through the skin.

Iontophoresis is widely used for the delivery of corticosteroids in treating acute or sub-acute inflammatory conditions and acute flare-ups of chronic inflammatory conditions.

Characteristics of drugs that could potentially be delivered using iontophoresis:

Used for localized conditions
Water-soluble
Positively or negatively charged
Relatively small molecular size
Advantages of iontophoresis:

The risk of infection is reduced because it is non-invasive.
Drug solutions are delivered directly to the treatment site without the disadvantages of injections or orally administered drugs.
It provides a relatively pain-free option for patients who are reluctant or unable to receive injections.
It minimizes the potential for further tissue trauma that can occur with increased pressure from a fluid bolus injection.
Iontophoresis requires medical knowledge and skill. It can only be performed by a physician or on the order of a physician by a trained health professional.

Author: admin  Site Admin
Post Sun Jun 15, 2003 1:08 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website  Reply with quote  

Yeah iontophoresis is another option to increase skin penetration. The problem being it has to be carried out at the clinic wheras with a liposome formulation you could potentially let the patient take the ointment home and apply it there.

Liposomes are still fairly new to the clinical world although they have been discussed in academia for some years. So far I don't know of any drugs available at the average * in liposomal formulations. So not really surprising the doc did not know much about them. Liposomes are still largely experimental.

_________________
Kevin - The management - keratin.com

Author: fonzie  Senior Poster
Post Sun Jun 15, 2003 4:20 pm 
 View user's profile Send private message  Reply with quote  

I'm lucky because the clinic where the derm works is just 2 blocks away from home, so I can easily go there and get it done.

She seems to be confident in the PUVA approach and advised me to try it for a couple of months. I'm just worried because I read PUVA can increase melanoma risk... or is that just for long-term PUVA?

She also talked about DPCP, but said its very hard to find it here in Portugal. Could I order from your clinic? Or from your clinic's supplier?

Author: serg  Guest
Post Tue Jun 17, 2003 10:50 am 
   Reply with quote  

i was wondering the same thing could i buy the dncp from you kevin??


  Display posts from previous:      

Page 3 of 6
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
   
Reply to topic
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Top of the page

Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group
www.keratin.net Copyright ©. All Rights Reserved www.keratin.com
Top of the page